top of page

2026 KsLeg session: School Funding


How did BV-area KS legislators vote on š—³š˜‚š—»š—±š—¶š—»š—“ š—½š˜‚š—Æš—¹š—¶š—° š—²š—±š˜‚š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» in 2026?


We’ve already shared information from BV Schools about the dire situation the district is facing due to the KS Legislature’s failure to fully fund Special Education (as statutorily required). The funding shortfall has caused the district to pull MILLIONS of dollars from general funds and cash reserves every year since 2011 to meet student needs. This robs EVERY student through class size increases, cuts to programs, and reduction in staff. Special Education excess costs are STILL not funded by the legislature.


šŸ®šŸ¬šŸ®šŸ³ š—•š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š˜: š—¦š—½š—²š—°š—¶š—®š—¹ š—˜š—±š˜‚š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—»š—¼š˜ š—³š˜‚š—¹š—¹š˜† š—³š˜‚š—»š—±š—²š—± = š—£š˜‚š—Æš—¹š—¶š—° š˜€š—°š—µš—¼š—¼š—¹š˜€ š—»š—¼š˜ š—³š˜‚š—¹š—¹š˜† š—³š˜‚š—»š—±š—²š—±

Yet, again this year, š™©š™š™š š™£š™šš™¬ š™Øš™©š™–š™©š™š š™—š™Ŗš™™š™œš™šš™© š™„š™–š™Øš™Øš™šš™™ š™—š™® š™†š™Øš™‡š™šš™œ š™™š™¤š™šš™Ø š™‰š™Šš™ š™›š™Ŗš™”š™”š™® š™›š™Ŗš™£š™™ š™šš™­š™˜š™šš™Øš™Ø š™Žš™„š™šš™˜š™žš™–š™” š™€š™™š™Ŗš™˜š™–š™©š™žš™¤š™£ š™˜š™¤š™Øš™©š™Ø. Result: Blue Valley Schools (and districts across the state) will be forced to continue pulling money from the general fund to cover the shortfall. When you hear legislators say they ā€œvoted to fully fund public schools,ā€ that statement refers to the per-pupil funding that the KS Supreme Court REQUIRED KsLeg to provide - the result of a years-long lawsuit (Gannon). But when per-pupil funds (that should go to classroom teachers, programs like art and music, world language, athletics) must be diverted to cover excess cost to educate students needing Special Education services, it results in lower per-pupil amounts to EVERY student. In BV, that amounts to $16 MILLION in 2025-26.


Voting YES, for a state budget that does NOT fully fund public education:Ā 

Representatives Croft, VanHouden, Tarwater, Turner

Senators Warren, Rose


Voting NO on the budget bill, opposing continued underfunding of KS public schools:

Representatives Featherston, Poskin, Meyer, Osman, McDonald

Senator Holscher


On top of DENYING needed funding, š˜š—µš—² š—¹š—²š—“š—¶š˜€š—¹š—®š˜š˜‚š—æš—² š—®š—“š—®š—¶š—» š˜ƒš—¼š˜š—²š—± š—³š—¼š—æ š˜š—®š˜… š—ŗš—¼š—»š—²š˜† š—“š—¶š˜ƒš—²š—®š˜„š—®š˜†š˜€ š˜š—¼ š—½š—æš—¶š˜ƒš—®š˜š—², š—²š˜…š—°š—¹š˜‚š˜€š—¶š˜ƒš—² š˜€š—°š—µš—¼š—¼š—¹š˜€. Private schools: NOT required to take any student; NOT required to publish student outcomes; allowed to reject or remove any student for ANY reason; often teach religious doctrine; may be for-profit; NOT subject to any oversight from their community (no School Board), Kansas taxpayers, or the state. Link at bottom to our Blog posts on this subject.


š—™š—²š—±š—²š—æš—®š—¹ š—§š—®š˜… š—ŗš—¼š—»š—²š˜† š˜š—¼ š—½š—æš—¶š˜ƒš—®š˜š—² š˜€š—°š—µš—¼š—¼š—¹š˜€Ā 

The legislature voted to participate in a federal tax diversion scheme like the one Kansas already has - where a taxpayer gets a tax CREDIT for ā€œdonatingā€ money (that they would have otherwise paid as taxes) to a ā€œScholarship Granting Organizationā€ (aka money-laundering organization) that takes a cut off the top and then hands it over to a private school - maybe a for-profit and/or religious private school. The bill was vetoed by Gov. Kelly but the Republican supermajority was able to override.


Voting YES to hand over EVEN MORE tax money to private schools with ZERO accountability for student outcomes:

Representatives Croft, VanHouden, Tarwater, Turner

Senators Warren, Rose


Voting NO, tax money should pay for public schools:

Representatives Featherston, Poskin, Meyer, Osman, McDonald

Senator Holscher


š—¦š˜š—®š˜š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—ŗš—¼š—»š—²š˜† š˜š—¼ š—½š—æš—¶š˜ƒš—®š˜š—² š˜€š—°š—µš—¼š—¼š—¹š˜€Ā 

Kansas already allows taxpayers to divert tax money to private schools to the tune of $10 million yearly, and there was an attempt to increase that cap to $15 million. The bill passed but was vetoed by Gov. Kelly. KsLeg didn’t have the votes to override her veto.


Voting YES, to increase the cap on tax money diversion to private schools:

Representatives Croft, VanHouden, Tarwater, Turner

Senators Warren, Rose


Voting NO, because tax money should go to public institutions that are transparent in how those dollars are being spent:

Representatives Featherston, Poskin, Meyer, Osman, McDonald

Senator Holscher


Most Blue Valley voters know the value of our outstanding public schools, and support funding them. Many are shocked to learn that some KS legislators from our own Blue Valley area consistently vote against funding our schools adequately, and vote to divert taxpayer money instead to fund private schools.


Share this post to help your neighbors know how their elected representatives are voting.


Links to read more about budget:

Federal tax diversion bill:

State tax diversion bills:

SUBV Blog post about tax credit scholarship/private school handouts:



Recent Posts

See All
Parents receive Email from District with concerning Legislative Update

Blue Valley-area legislators š—žš—²š—¹š—¹š—¶š—² š—Ŗš—®š—æš—æš—²š—», š—§š— š—„š—¼š˜€š—², š—–š—µš—æš—¶š˜€ š—–š—æš—¼š—³š˜, š—–š—µš—¶š—½ š—©š—®š—»š—›š—¼š˜‚š—±š—²š—», š—¦š—²š—®š—» š—§š—®š—æš˜„š—®š˜š—²š—æ, š—®š—»š—± š—–š—®š—æš—¹ š—§š˜‚š—æš—»š—²š—æ voted AGAINST parenta

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments


bottom of page